-->
In my previous blogs post I proposed the creation of a meta-analysis of tepui expeditionary documentation in order to determine the realities the tepui biodiversity. This proposal was based on recent scholarly papers and observations of Nasua nasua vittata on multiple tepui summits, Tamandua tetradactyla on Auyan, and Cerdocyon thous thous on the slopes of Auyan Tepui. The presence of these medium to large sized mammals seems to indicate that Auyan Tepui may contain greater biodiversity than previously thought. When these observations are compared to the scientific literature regarding tepui summit fauna, it becomes apparent that a knowledge gap exists regarding the distribution of fauna on the tepui slopes and summits. This knowledge gap needs to be addressed to avoid labelling or location errors which could mask the presence of >5kg lowland mammals on the tepui summits.
-->
-->
Introduction
In my previous blogs post I proposed the creation of a meta-analysis of tepui expeditionary documentation in order to determine the realities the tepui biodiversity. This proposal was based on recent scholarly papers and observations of Nasua nasua vittata on multiple tepui summits, Tamandua tetradactyla on Auyan, and Cerdocyon thous thous on the slopes of Auyan Tepui. The presence of these medium to large sized mammals seems to indicate that Auyan Tepui may contain greater biodiversity than previously thought. When these observations are compared to the scientific literature regarding tepui summit fauna, it becomes apparent that a knowledge gap exists regarding the distribution of fauna on the tepui slopes and summits. This knowledge gap needs to be addressed to avoid labelling or location errors which could mask the presence of >5kg lowland mammals on the tepui summits.
It is now apparent that global
climate change will compromise the survival of Pantepui species and ecosystems. A recent study
conducted as part of the PANTEPUI project delineates this threat in great detail
(Vegas-Vilarrubia et al 2012 ). For the 26 tepuis included in the
study, 42.3% are expected to suffer the complete extinction of their
summit floral biota through vertical displacement within the next one hundred years. The remaining vascular plant species will suffer range restriction to the point that the surviving ecosystems may become destabilized. The paper identifies 4 levels of
threats to the tepui ecosystems, based on connectivity, shared flora,
and projected area loss. Auyan Tepui and the Eastern District tepuis
(as defined in Huber, 1988) are least threatened, and may serve as
potential refugia for in situ conservation efforts in the future.
Given this situation, establishing the realities of the faunal
composition of Auyan Tepui and the large tepuis of the eastern
Pantepui sector is of the utmost importance.
In an effort to solve this problem, I have compiled a list of mammal sightings on Auyan detailed in “The mammals of the Guiana
Region” by G.H.H Tate, circa 1938. This work is the first published review of mammals observed on or near the Eastern Sector tepuis, and is partly based on the 1937-38 Phelps expedition to Auyan Tepui. A detailed account of the Phelps expedition is described by Tate in “Auyantepui:
Notes on the Phelps Venezuelan Expedition” which describes the collection sites and camp locations. The
Phelps expedition collected at four camp sites; camp 1 at 460 meters near
the Urullen Valley, camp 2 (known as Guayaraca) at 1100 meters, camp 3
at 1850 meters, and camp 4 at 2200 meters (see map below).
The duration of the Phelps expedition
on the summit of Auyan Tepui is unmatched to this day. From November 1937 to March 1938 the expedition spent time
exploring the southern access point of Auyan Tepui. By comparison,
the 1994 expedition of the Robert G. Goelet American
Museum-Terramar herpetological expedition to the summit of Auyan
Tepui only lasted a month. The
2012 camera trapping expedition of Auyan lasted roughly 14 days, and was conducted at Guayaraca (1010 meters), Penon, (1838 meters), and Naranja (2161
meters); locations roughly identical to the area explored by Tate
during the Phelps expedition.
Tate states “the (mammal) fauna of the summit zone of the Guiana Mountains (5000-8000 feet) comprises nine types of animals: Didelphis marsupialis, Marmosa cincera, Marmosa tyleriana, Tamandua tetradactyla, Coendou, near melanurus, Akodon aerosus, Podoxymys roraimae, Thomasomys macconnelli and Nasua Candace dichromatica”. This is a broad generalization, though it remains the most comprehensive characterization of tepui mammal fauna, as subsequent expeditionary work has not expanded on either the survey locations or field time of the Phelps expedition.
Tate states “the (mammal) fauna of the summit zone of the Guiana Mountains (5000-8000 feet) comprises nine types of animals: Didelphis marsupialis, Marmosa cincera, Marmosa tyleriana, Tamandua tetradactyla, Coendou, near melanurus, Akodon aerosus, Podoxymys roraimae, Thomasomys macconnelli and Nasua Candace dichromatica”. This is a broad generalization, though it remains the most comprehensive characterization of tepui mammal fauna, as subsequent expeditionary work has not expanded on either the survey locations or field time of the Phelps expedition.
However, this characterizations of the tepui mammal distribution is not entirely
precise, as Tate lists 30 species of mammals which were
encountered during the Phelps expedition that were not included in his summary. Presented below is a compiled list of the mammals observed or collected during the Phelps
Auyan Tepui expedition.
The
fauna list
The following list is a reduction of Tate’s "Mammals of the Guiana Highlands" in which only the mammals observed on Auyan are present in the list. This reduction is necessary in order to organize this large document into a manageable size so that an analysis of Auyan Tepui mammal fauna can be conducted. The purpose of this list is to determine which mammals are recorded as normative fauna ( ie established in literature as being present on Auyan from initial exploration) and which mammals are anomalous fauna (ie not recorded as being present on Auyan) so that future mammal sightings will not be misinterpreted.
"The Mammals of the Guiana Highlands" is at times problematic in that elevational data is inconsistent, referencing is vague for certain species, and taxonomic nomenclature has changed for a number of the species included in the list since its publication in 1939. I have compiled the data from Tate's work in an attempt to clarify some of these problems with the inclusion of updated nomenclature and current conservation status using the IUCN Redlist as a guide. The scientific names of the species described by Tate are italicized; where the names have been altered I have included the updated nomenclature in parenthesis followed by the common name in bold. After the appellations, the current distribution and IUCN Redlist status of the species are stated. Finally, the description, collection altitude, and details of the species collected are presented enclosed in apostrophe as verbatim by Tate.
"The Mammals of the Guiana Highlands" is at times problematic in that elevational data is inconsistent, referencing is vague for certain species, and taxonomic nomenclature has changed for a number of the species included in the list since its publication in 1939. I have compiled the data from Tate's work in an attempt to clarify some of these problems with the inclusion of updated nomenclature and current conservation status using the IUCN Redlist as a guide. The scientific names of the species described by Tate are italicized; where the names have been altered I have included the updated nomenclature in parenthesis followed by the common name in bold. After the appellations, the current distribution and IUCN Redlist status of the species are stated. Finally, the description, collection altitude, and details of the species collected are presented enclosed in apostrophe as verbatim by Tate.
Didelphimorphia
1)Didelphis
marsupialis marsupialis: common possum, comadreja grande. Wide distribution across G.S., and into Central America.
IUCN status LC. “Material- Mt Duida (6); Mt Roraima (4); Mt
Auyan-tepui (9). The affinities of D. marsupialis are with
Didelphis of the surrounding lowlands- the Amazonian and Orinoco
basins. Animals from the highlands (up to 7000 feet), readily picked
out by their denser fur, seem directly derived from the lowland
form.”
2)
Metachirus nudicaudatus: brown four eyed possum, cuica común . Wide distribution
across G. S. IUCN status
LC. “Material-
Foot of Mt. Duida, 300 feet, juvenile female. Auyan tepui, 1500 feet,
5 specimens, and at 3500 feet 1 specimen. The Duida specimen is
considerably browner in general tone, and particularly along the
sides, than any of the individuals from farther east. 5 specimens at
1500 feet.”
3)
Marmosa Gray: (Taxa name not valid in IUCN): mouse possums
“Three of the five principle groups of Marmosa represented
in the Guiana highlands:
3.1)
Micoureus demararae areiticola: ( sub-species possibly invalid,
synonymous with Marmosa demerarae). long-furred woolly mouse opossum, woolly mouse opossum, marmosa grande gris.
Wide range for M. demararae, not present west of
Venezuela. IUCN status LC. “The original series of eight
from Mt. Roraim (1300m) from Auyan Tepui 460 meters (8), 1100 meters
(13) 1850 meters (one and an extra skull). The race appears to be
morphologically uniform both at Roraima and at Auyan-tepui. At the
latter locality through a vertical range of 1390 meters no definable
difference can be seen.”
3.2)Marmosa
murina roraimae: (possibly defunct subspecies) murine mouse opossum. Wide distribution across G.S. IUCN status LC.
“Roraima; Material: the original series of 14 from Roraima (1400
meters); from Auyan-Tepui 460 meters (8) 1100 meters (only 1). The
Auyan-Tepui material conforms precisely with that from Roraima,
differing from M. m duidae and M. m. klagesi by
characteristics given previously ( loc, cit) probably, however, it
integrates with the latter.”
3.3)
Marmosa tyleriana phelpsi: (subspecies
of M. tyleriana). Tyler's mouse opossum. Endemic
to G.H., Estado Bolivar and Estado Amazonas, stated as being
restricted to three isolated tepuis (Duida-Marahuaca,
Jaua-Sarisariñama, and Auyantepui) at elevations between 1,300 and
2,200 m. (IUCN ver. 3.1 2011). IUCN status DD. “(new sub
species) type: No 130502, AMNH adult female, Auyan-tepui plateau,
1850 meters. Collector G.H.H Tate. General characteristics- a dark
race of the somewhat rufous M. tyleriana. Description- color
dorsally near Prout's brown, ventrally with the identical fawn shade
of true tyleriana. Quality of pelage, characteristics of the
tail and ears as tyleriana but feet rather darker. Skull not
distinguishable from that of tyleriana... Besides the holotype
the collection from Auyan-tepui includes seven paratypes and an
additional specimen from 2200 meters. Duida, Auyan-Tepui.”
3.4)
Marmosops parvidens: delicate slender opossum. Present in Guiana, Surinam and French Guiana, limited records
from Estado Bolivar, known in Columbia and Peru, may be
synonymous with M. pinhreroi. IUCN
status LC.
“Material- two adults female and male from Auyan tepui 460 meters
and one adult female from 1100 meters. The rediscovery of this
interesting species known hitherto only by the type specimen which
was collected in 1906 is of great interest. The animals were all
trapped in tropical to lower forest in traps set under logs.”
4)
Monodelphis brevicaudata: northern red sided possum. Endemic
to the G.S. IUCN
status LC. “Material: The type of M. b. dorsalis
Allen and two paratypes-all three young; a series of specimens
from Mt. Auyan-Tepui 460 meters (one from 1100 meters)...17 from
Duida...seven from Roraima , 3800 feet.” … well defined
buffy facial area, extending usually from the rhinarium to the top of
the head in eastern subspecies.”
Xenarthra
5)
Cabassous unicinctus: southern naked tailed armadillo, cabasú de orejas largas. Wide
distribution from G.S into Brazil. IUCN
status LC.
“Material -British Guiana, several specimens. At Mt Auyan -Tepui
many small holes, probably the work of this armadillo, were observed
in open, sandy places. Neither we, nor he Indians who were offered a
substantial bonus for specimens, ever managed to secure one.”
6)Tamandua
tetradactyla: southern tamandua, southern anteater, brazo fuerte, hormiguero de collar, oso melero. Wide range and
distribution across the Neotropics. IUCN status LC. “Material:
Mt. Roraima (1) Mt Auyan-Tepui (4) Mt Duida (4). This form of
anteater is quite common on the plateaus of Duida and Auyan-tepui
between 6000 and 8000 feet as it is at altitudes between 2000 and
3000 feet. The Roraima specimen was brought in by an Indian to base
camp, and consequently was probably taken at about 4000 feet.”
7)
Myrmecophaga tridactyla: giant anteater, hormiguero gigante, oso caballo. Wide distribution,
but probably extinct across previous ranges in Belize, Costa Rica,
and Guatemala. Extinct in Uruguay. IUCN
status VU.
“Material- Mt Roraima (1) ; Mt Auyan-tepui (1 and a pick-up skull).
A full grown giant anteater was seen at the “Tree Savanas” foot
of Mt Duida, but not captured. These animals apparently range all
over the guianan savanna region up to 5000 feet. They are met with in
the forest, though usually near savannah. Thomas records a specimen
from 'Mount Roraima, 5000 feet' ”.
Rodentia
8)
Proechimys cayennensis: (official scientific name is Proechimys
guyannensis, synonym with
Proechimys warreni. Molecular
phylogenetic may result in split of species into several different
species). Cayenne spiny rat. Distributed in the
lowlands of the G.S, supposedly restricted to 500 meters. IUCN
status LC. “Material: Mt. Roraima, 3500 -4200 feet (32) Mt
Auyan Tepui, 1500 feet (44), R. Cotinga savannas 500 feet (64) R.
Yuruan approx 1500 feet (6) lower R. Caura 1000 feet (9) Esemeralda
Mt Duida 300 and 00 feet (67), lowlands of British Guiana (10).”
9)
Dasyprocta cayanus: ('cayanus' seems defunct,
scientific name Dasyprocta
leporina) red
rumped agouti. Range from
Caribean Islands, Trinidad and Tobago into the G.S., from Estado
Bolivar into French Guiana and Surinam. IUCN
status LC. “Material:
B.G. Lowlands R. Yuruan (1) Mt. Auyan Tepui 2000 feet (1) 3500 feet
(1) El Llagual mouth of the Cura River (1).”
10)
Cuniculus paca: (formerly
Agouit paca). spotted paca, paca, tepezquintle. Range
is all across South America. IUCN
status LC. “Material
Mt Auyan tepui, 1500 feet (1) British Guiana several, Mt Duida
several.”
11)
Cavia pallas, Cavia guianae: (C. guianae
is not a recognized taxa, most likely Cavia aperea) guinea
pig. Animal is wide
ranging across South America. IUCN status LC.
“Material Mt. Auyan tepui, four females at 1500 feet, type
venezuelae.”
12)
Chalcomys aerosus saturates: (Chalcomys is an archaic
synonym for Akodon, currently recognized genus, genus renamed
Calomys. Dubious classification, it could be Akodon aerosus
). vesper mice “new subspecies no 131020, AMNH adult female
Auyan tepui plateau, 6000 feet. Four paratypes and three specimens
also found at 7500 feet on Auyan...Much of the material from Mt.
Duida (4500 to 7000 feet) is referable to saturate form just
described. From the ‘Savanna Hills Camp,’, 4500 feet, in the
center of the table land the material becomes slightly more aerosus
–like, though it by no means approaches the gray-brown shade of our
material from Auyan-Tepui at 3500 and 2000 feet. From the Duida
plateau we have 45 specimens.”
13)
Zygodontomys microtinus: (sub-species of Zygodontomys
brevicauda) short-tailed cane mouse. Range is from Central America into Venezuela and north of the Amazon river. IUCN
status LC. “Material- Auyan- Tepui , 3500 feet (7), 2000 feet
(48). Mt Duida Esmeralda Savannas, 350 feet.”
14)
Oryzomys macconnelli maconellis: (Sub species of
Oryzomys macconnelli, taxonomically complicated genus.)
Macconnell's rice rat. Wide
distribution. IUCN status
LC. “Material:
Auyan tepui, 3500 feet (15), 2000 feet(5). “In our
Roraima-Duida-Auyan-tepui series, as well as those from British
Guiana and Cotinga River, in north Brazil, all colour variations can
be found. Juvenile animals are slate coloured, gradually assuming the
rufesent hue of maturity.”
15)
Oryzomys laticeps: (Currently
Hylaeamys laticeps
as of 2006). large-headed rice rat. Range is limited, confined
to the Atlantic forest in Brazil, fragmented habitats with a
decreasing population trend. IUCN status NT. “Material- Mt.
Roraima (35), Kartabo, British Guiana (22); Mt. Auyan-Tepui (95); Mt
Duida (33) this is the commonest of the forest dwellers among the
Guiana oryzomine mice , 9 forms listed from Colombia to Venezuela to
Trinidad.”
16)
Oligoryzomys delicates: delicate pygmy rice rat.
Current taxonomic status and IUCN status not found. “Material- Mt
Roraima, 3500 to 6500 feet (41); Mt. Auyan Tepui 3500 feet (27) 2000
feet (1) . These mice were found most commonly in rather open
environments where shrubs grew instead of threes. Occasional
specimens, however, were met within the forest.”
17) Oecomys
phelpsi: (taxanomic status under revision, see also Oecomys
auyantepui news species No. 131156 AMNH, ) arboreal rice rat. “new subspecies No 131164 AMNH Young adult male,
South slopes of Auyan Tepui 3500 feet comments 'A peculiarly aberrant
mouse with external features, except the mark on the dorsum of the
foot, common in Rhipidomys. It is unfortunate that this unusual mouse
if founded upon a single individual. It was trapped in heavy
forest.'”
18) Thomasomys
macconnelli: (scientific name Rhipidomys macconnelli)
MacConnels climbing mouse. Range is restricted to the Guiana
Highlands in Venezuela, Guiana, and Brazil. IUCN status LC.
“Material- Mt. Roraima (summit) (21); slopes 6000 feet (27); Mt
Duida (summit) 4500 feet to 7600 feet (135) Mt. Auyan-tepui (summit)
1800 to 2200 feet (35). “I have been unable to distinguish between
the above listed series from the summit of the three mountains
studied. …the few individuals taken on the much lower levels (3500
feet) at Roraima and Auyan Tepui are paler and have considerably
shorter pelage than the typical form.”
19)
Rhipidomys venezuelae: Venezuelan Climbing Mouse
Distribution in north and west Venezuela and Colombia, eastern
distribution unclear. IUCN status LC. “Our Guiana highlands
collections include chiefly specimens of milleri, of which we
have the type in the American Museum for comparison. They were taken
at Auyan Tepui, 3500 feet, and Roraima at the same altitude.
Subspecies Rhipidomys nitela found on Auyan Tepui at 3500
feet. This mouse was taken in the forest at Auyan tepui, in the
gallery woods about Roraima and Limao.”
20)
Nectomys peters: (Broad classification, probably Nectomys
palmipes. Nectomys is a genus of rodent in the tribe Oryzomyini
of family Cricetidae. It is closely related to
Amphinectomys and was formerly considered congeneric with
Sigmodontomys). Trinidad water rat. Ranges from
Trinidad into mainland Venezuela, distribution analysis considered
incomplete. IUCN status LC. “Material-Mt Auyan-Tepui, 3500
feet (6), Mt Roraima 3500 feet (2)... The Duida (Nectomys)
specimens have somewhat smaller teeth than those from Roraima and
Auyan-Tepui. We may therefore refer to them, respectively, as N.
s. rattus and N.s palmipes (= melanius).”
Carnivora
22)
Nasua candace dichromatica: (Nasua nasua vittata;
dichromatica is synonomyous with vittata). South
American Coati, Coatamundi, Achuni, Coatí, Tejón. Extremely
wide distribution, vittata subspecies found in Venezuela.
IUCN status LC. “New sub species type No 131166 AMNH Adult
female Plateau of Mt Auyan Tepui, at approximately 6000 feet….The
type is a pick up skeleton with relatively few parts missing, the
skull complete expect certain teeth.” See discussion for further
details.
23)Mustela
linnaeus: (Either M. africana or M.
frenata, most likely the latter). Long tailed or Amazon
weasel, Comedreja Andina, or Comedreja Amazónica. Wide
distribution, both present in Venezuela but not widespread there.
IUCN status LC for both subspecies. “ Material- one skull
taken from a ledge near the summit of Mt. Duida at 7000 feet; one
skin (with out skull) from the lower terrace of Mt. Auyan tepui (3500
feet).”
24)
Felis concolor: (Puma concolor) Mountain
lion, Puma, Cougar, León Americano, León Bayo, León Colorado, León
De Montaña. Wide
range, population and subspecies vary from region to region,
extensive hunting and range reduction in certain areas;
localized extinctions. IUCN
status LC. “Material- At Auyan tepui, the Indians reported pumas as of
rare occurrence. At Roraima they seem altogether ignorant of these
animals.”
Primates
25)
Cebus apella: ( Sub species C. a. apella, C. a.
margarita) Black-capped Capuchin Monkey. Wide
ranging species, depending on resolution of species taxonomy which is
complex. Sub species C. a.
Margarita restricted to
Margarita Island, Venezuela. IUCN
status LC. “A
large number of specimens from the Mt Duida region taken by the Tyler
Duida expedition, a small series from Mt. Auyan Tepui, middle Rio
Caroni.”
Perissodactyla
26) Tapirus
terrestris: South American tapir, danto.
Wide range, but extirpated from numerous areas. Population dynamics
require study. IUCN
status VU. “At
Mt. Auyan Tepui tapir tracks were abundant as high as 3500 feet.
Probably they go higher when the terrain is suitable, for on the
eastern slopes of the Andes near the Pastaza Rover I found tracks of
tapir above 7000 feet.”
Artiodactyla
27)
Tayassu tajacu: (now classified as Pecari tajacu). collared peccary, báquiro cinchado. Extremely wide
distribution, including North America. IUCN status LC.
“Material- Mt Duida area (3); Mt Auyan Tepui (1).”
28)
Tayassu pecari: white-lipped peccary, cariblanco, chancho de monte, pecari de labios blanco. Wide distribution, extirpated in
El Salvador. IUCN status NT. “Material- Mt Auyan tepui (7);
British Guiana (the series of 10 or more representing T. p. beebi
Anthony); mouth of Rio Uaupes (2). Also studied; material from
Suriname, Colombia, Peru and Brazil. The skull of the type and
several individuals of beebi differ from our material from
Auyan-tepui in possessing considerably wider molars and larger
premolars. … Meanwhile, for the purposes of this paper we can state
only that the white-lipped peccaries of the east and south of the
Guiana region are chiefly large toothed; those of the west and north
(including Auyan-tepui) are essentially small toothed.”
39)
Cervidae- “I (Tate) saw but failed to secure a fully
antlered buck at Mt. Auyan Tepui, 3000 feet”
30)
Mazama nemorivaga Amazonian Brown Brocket, Amazonian Brown
Brocket Deer, Small Brown Brocket Deer, Matacán Grisáceo, Soche
Gris. Wide distribution across
northern South America. IUCN status LC. “Material Thirteen
specimens from British Guiana; Mt Auyan tepui (1) (small teeth), Mt
Duida (3); the type of Murelia from Caqueta.
Analysis
The total number of mammal specimens collected by Tate during the Auyan-Tepui expedition is
approximately 750 individual animals (Musser and Patton 1989), making the Phelps expedition the most authoritative survey of the mammalian fauna of Auyan Tepui to date. Of the
134 species of nonvolant mammals known from the G.S., 29 are present
from 450 to 2200 meters on Auyan Tepui. Rodents make up the majority
of mammals found on Auyan Tepui, with 12 species in four families;
roughly 20% of the total number of rodent species found across
the G.S. The majority of
these rodents were collected at 2000 to 3500 feet, or 600 to 1000
meters, in the low to mid altitude slopes of the Auyan dominated by
mountain forests. Of the 12 species of rodent recorded, all are
designated IUCN Least Concern (LC) except 4: Chalcomys
errosus,
Oligoryzomys
delicates,
Oecomys
phelpsi
and Oryzomys
laticepts.
Of these four species, only O.
laticepts
is listed as Near Threatened (NT) while the other three species are
not listed as they are either taxonomically invalid or have not been
taxonomically resolved. O.
laticepts
has been reclassified as Hylaeamys
laticeps as
of 2006 (Weksler et al 2006), and is listed as being restricted to
the Brazilian Atlantic forest, by the
IUCN (Percequillo, A. & Weksler, M. 2008, Patton et al 2000).
Tate mentions that 95 specimens of Hylaeamys
laticeps ( former
Oryzomys
laticepts)
were taken during the Auyan-Tepui expedition. If this
reclassification of Tates “O. laticepts” into Hylaeamys
laticeps
is accurate, this could mean that a population of H.
laticeps
in the GH could act as a buffer to the extinction of the Atlantic
forest population. Regarding the status of O.
phelpsi,
it would seem that the species' taxonomic status is under revision due to an error in
classification regarding the mismatch of the the initial sample. Tate collected only one specimen of this species, and produced
a mismatch holotype by combining the skin of Akadon
with the skull of O.
phelpsi.
Tate restricted the holotype and species name phelpsi
to the skull alone after recognizing his mistake, but latter analysis revealed more problems with
the species. It was discovered that the skull was a composite of a
mismatched cranium and mandible, which was subsequently rematched,
placing the species name phelpsi
with a single mandible. The authors of the work detailing the
re-evaluation of this species state that O.
phelpsi
is not a synonym of O.
guianae,
or O.
auyantepui,
but represents a species unsuccessfully collected by Tate similar in
appearance to O.
bicolor. Currently, O.
phelpsi is temporarily placed with O.
bicolor
until the nature of the Auyan Tepui population is established (Musser and Patton 1989). There seems to be some confusion over the
status and resolution of the Muridae
family on the slopes and summits of Auyan Tepui, as only two of the 9
species present as reported by Tate remain valid.
Didelphimorphia
The
next most abundant family present on Auyan Tepui are the Didelphids,
or opossums, with four of the six represented by marsupial mice in
the supergenus Marmosa.
Marmosa
demerarae (formerly
Micoureus
demararae)
was
the most abundantly found species, with 22 taken from Auyan Tepui up
to 1850 meters. All opossums were distributed from the low altitude
camp into the higher elevations, though their density did decrease
with altitude. From a conservation stand point, all members of
Didelphimorphia are listed as IUCN Least Concern, with the exception
of Marmosa
tyleriana phelpsi,
which is restricted to three tepui summits and listed as being Data
Deficient (DD). Marmosa
marina roraimae
may be a defunct sub-species, in which roraimae
is no longer valid, and Micoureus
demararae has
since been reclassified as Marmosa
demararae (with
Micoureus
being a sub genus of Marmosa).
Since the collecting expedition by Tate, the phylogenetics of the
mouse opossums has been reviewed and certain change to their taxonomy
has been made. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA of Marmosa
and the sub-genus Micoureus
supports an increased diversity of species recorded thus far, most
notably from wide ranging species in Central America. In the South
American species, Marmosa
demerarae
in French Guiana, (present on Auyan Tepui), shows marked genetic
differentiation from the M.
demerarae
in Peru, supporting a division of the species into subspecies. The study also
confirmed the status of M.
tyleriana,
where its closest relatives were M.
murina
and M.
waterhousi.
Based on this study, there is some strong evidence to break up the
genus into cis vs trans Andean species, with significant
differentiation in cis Andean species such as M.
demerarae
and M.
lepida.
Carnivora
Four members of Carnivora are present on Auyan Tepui, with the coati "Nasua candace dichromatica" (now Nasua. nasua vittata) being the most abundant. Tates
observations of this animal are interesting, as they may be used to
resolve the unusual coloration of coatis observed on Roraima and
Chimanta Massif mentioned in Havelkova (2006) and Ronvinsky (2007).
Tate calls “dichromatica” a new sub species, based on smaller
dentition and what he reffered to as “sexual dichromatism” in
observed coatis. He believed that the males were buff colored, where
as the females were rufous . He observed 8 individual animals, each
with a markedly different pelage arrangement and coloration. This
observation has been disregarded, though the variation in coati
pelage coloration was noted in Havelkova et al (2006) with regard to
unusually colored coatis on the summit of Roraima Tepui, and again in
Robovsky et al (2007) on Churi Tepui, in the Chimanta Massif.
Observed Auyan Tepui coatis seem to lack this color variation, and
appear uniformly brown-black in coloration, as apparent from the
Terramar expeditions in the late 1980s, and recent photographs of a
black coati taken in 2008 by Pomares and crew (images below) during an expedition to the Auyan Tepui. Based on this body of
work, it now apperas that coatis are residents of the large tepuis in
the eastern pantepui sector. In the Canid family, only Cerdocyon
thous thous the crab eating fox
was sighted by Tate, although no altitudinal data was given in his
report. Tates observations were confirmed in 2012, and currently C.
t. thous is known to range to at
least 1010 metres in the southern terrace of Auyan Tepui. Though a
span of nearly 80 years separates these reports, it is likely that
crab eating foxes were not observed by subsequent expeditions due to
their nocturnal modality.
Juvenile coati photographed in near Libertador, 2009 |
With
regard to felids, Tate makes it clear in his text that mountain lions
and large cats are considered rare on Auyan and unknown on Roraima by
the indigenous Pemon people. Recent sightings of what has been
described as a large felid (Panthera leo) comes
from two sources; Gorzula (1991) and George (1989). Gorzula describes a
(probably) stray solitary mountain lion, while in George (1989) Armando
Michelangeli (at the time the leader of a Terramar expedition
to Auyan Tepui) observed a female mountain lion with two cubs exiting
a cave along a dry river bank on the eastern portion of Auyan Tepui
(i.e. east of Canyon del Diablo.). The 1989 sightings were not
reported in academic literature, though the concept of large mammals inhabiting the tepui summits is presented in the book “Tepuys,
Colossos de la Tierra”, published in 2005 by Terramar expedition mmbers. With regard to the amazon weasle Mustela linnaeus I
have been unable to find any further mention of it on a tepui, and I
therefore
assume that it was observed at the base camp placing
it more toward the lowlands than the talus slope of Auyan.
Xenarthra
I
have detailed the distribution of Pilosa on this blog before, and
that post will serve as the primary reference for this order. I have since
investigated the IUCN distribution report of Brdaypus
tridactyla which states that
this sloth is present on tepui summits. At this time this
distribution can not be confirmed or negated, as the reference
material for this statement can not be found. Thus, T. tetradactyla is a tepui resident (at least on Auyan), Myrmecophaga
tridactyla has yet to be
verified, and B. tridactylus
requires further investigation.
Primates,
Perissodactyla and Artiodactyla.
The
reference to Cebus apella
is the only reference to primates near Auyan I have encountered.
According to the IUCN Redlist, the name C. apella
is no longer valid, suggesting either C. a. apella
or C. a. margarita, where C. a. apella
is not known to range into Venezuela. Alternativly, the Smithsonian
publication "Checklist of the Vertebrates of the Guiana Shield" list Cebus
apella as a valid name, and list this primate as distributed throughout the GS. I do not think this monkey is near
the summit or talus slopes, as it is mentioned by Tate as being observed in
the middle of the Rio Caroni. This distribution does require more
scrutiny, though it is probably irrelevant to studies of tepui summit
and slope fauna. The only member of Perissodactyla (odd-toes
ungulates) in the G.S is the tapir Tapirus terrestris,
Tate remarks that tapir foot prints were observed at 3000 feet (approx
1000 metres), though he suspects that Tapirs are present on the
summit. This observation is also made in George "1989", and by Huber
in his 1988 paper. The 1989 source relates to sightings of tapir
footprints made near campo Dragon and Second Wall on Auyan Tepui, and
were also sighted in the western regions of the tepui in valleys, which contained dense gallery forests. During the course
of the Terra-X documentary “Islands above the Rainforest” (Artz, 1991) certain
expedition members proposed at one point that sightings of three
unknown animals swimming in a lagoon were in fact misidentified
tapirs. This would make sense, as tapirs would probably be present on
Auyan along riparian gallery forests foraging for food, however this is
still speculation. Tracks of tapirs have been observed by Terramar
expedition members on Auyan Tepui in the mid 1980s (George, 1989). These sightings
confirm Tataes observations; whereas tapirs in Venezuela are mostly
confined to the lowlands, according to Tate “Mt. Auyan-tepui tapir
tracks were abundant as high as 3,500 feet”.
Both
species of peccary, Tayassu pecari (Pecari
tajacu) and Tayassu
pecari lack altitudinal data for
their collection points, thus I have assume that they were collected at
around 450 metres. The lack of any documentation of peccarys on any tepui
summit seem to support this, although this is in no way conclusive.
An unknown member of Cervidae (indicated
in the text as an adult male) was spotted at 1000 metres, as was an
Amazon brown brocket Mazama nemorivaga, though no collection altitude was provided. All members of
Cervidae represented
in the G.S. are wide ranging as is M. nemorivaga,
although M. nemorivaga
is not recorded as being present in the G.S. This raises the question as to what deer
Tate observed, as the only listed G.S species are Mazama
americana, Mazama
gouazoubira, and Odocoileus
cariacou.
Discussion
Establishing
the realities of tepui faunal distribution is critical for further developing successful conservation strategies in the pantepui, and furthering human understanding of global biodiversity. The threat posed by global warming to the endemic
flora is too extreme to be ignored, and the resultant extinctions and
vertical displacement will alter the tepui summit ecosystems. This is
a scientific and ethical dilemma; there is no way to reverse this
extinction process and humans must decide what get saved from
extinction and what does not. In order to design effective
conservation strategies for the preservation of tepui summit
organisms and ecosystems, the interplay of lowland fauna with the
tepui summit communities must be established. The development of
these strategies require that trends in current tepui biodiversity
(defined as faunal/floral interaction in an extinction scenario as a result of
upland displacement caused by rapid climate change) are assessed with
regard to current and predicted lowland faunal interactions. As an
example of complex potential interaction, some of the animals
observed on the tepui summits and talus slopes such as Cerdocyon
thous thous and Tapirus
terrestris act as primary seed
dispersers. As the climate envelope for vascular plants shifts, these
two animals may facilitate the movement of lowland plants onto the
tepui summits. At this point the interplay between lowland frugivores
and summit flora is not understood as large lowland organisms are
still considered to be absent on the tepui summits. In fact, the
distribution mechanics of tepui summit flora is not completely
understood in and of itself (Rull 2010).
This
gap in the understanding
of tepui ecosystems dynamics and paleoecology is only now being
addressed. Current molecular phylogenetic analysis of tepui fauna
indicates that the herpetofauna of the tepuis is far younger than
previously expected (Salerno et al 2012). While the paleofauna
thesis has long been dismissed, it appears as though gene flow
between summit reptile and amphibian communities stopped sometime
between the Pleistocene and Holocene, leading to little genetic
variation in the "isolated" tepui summit herpetofauna (Kok et al, 2012). This is a
very recent date for the isolation of tepui summit herpetofauna,
and indicates that the current ecosystem
composition is much younger than previously thought. This is
interesting; when the the niche of tepui summit herpetofauna
is examined it tends to be highly specific, implying a lack of plasticity in niche breadth which would indicate long term isolation. However, it is quite
possible that the colonization of the tepui summits by small
vertebrates was extremely difficult under glacial conditions during
the Pleistocene, when the hypothetical tepui paramos existed, and the
current tepui like ecosystems were distributed in lower elevations. The other alternative to explain the recent date of the herpetofaunal assemblage of pantepui is a kind of "waif dispersal", in which amphibians and reptiles spread to the various summits by being displaced there, possibly by birds. Such an explaination defies the patterns of herpetofaunal assembalges (in which greater summit area equates to greater species richness), and treats the tepuis as true "sky islands", which seems at odds with the observed patterns of tepui paleoecology. We can see from the mammalian fauna that the tepuis can host a variety of large lowland vertebrates; they are not as isolated as they appear to be.
Thus,
I am in favor of climate and substrate related constrains on tepui
ecosystem establishment as the determining factor, as opposed to
limited and long term waif dispersal as a mechanism for explaining
tepui summit vertebrate fauna composition. In light of
palaeoecological realities, this would explain why tepui summit
herpetofauna lacks genetic tepui to tepui differentiation and genetic
diversity, and explains both the lack of tepui specific endemic
rodents and the continued sightings of lowland mammals on the
summits, as the same animals were interacting with tepui floral
assemblages at lower altitudes during the Pleistocene and have simply
followed these assemblages to higher elevations.
Conclusions
When
looking at tepui summit fauna, there is a complex interplay of
climate, elevation, ecosystems, endemism, and gene flow. The
normative view of tepui dynamics and biogeography has changed over
the years. Initially considered a “lost world” of paleofauna in
isolation, tepui ecosystems are now
considered to be the result of the complex
interplay of climate change, recent colonization, and extinction
events. Limiting factors such as climate and substrate play a greater
role than topographical isolation, and barriers to colonization are
reduced. In the case of the largest tepuis, floral assembaleges are
diverse, and carrying capacity may be larger than previously
anticipated. Auyan Tepui maintains five distinct vegetational zones,
and is unique in that grassy savannah is present in the south and
centre of the tepui, creating a possible migration corridor. Auyan is
partly topographically connected with the Chimanta Massif, leading to the
creation of a large complex of migration routes between these areas.
Tates
list of fauna can provide the basis for studying the interactions
between lowland species and tepui summit species, on all levels of
analysis. Using this list, it is possible to address the concepts of
normative vs anomalous fauna. Normative fauna is defined as low
density, small bodied, and confined to didelphimorphia
and rodentia. Anomalous fauna is broadly classified as comprising
medium to large bodied wide ranging G.S species. The
two groups can merge in a synthesis which was implied in
Robovsky and Havelkova with their review of tepui summit coatis;
lowland species physically able to access the tepui summits may find
an available ecological niche and exploit it. This phenomena has
probably not been recognized as research gaps produced by limited
expedition duration and long periods of time between expeditionary
work have skewed sampling efforts. Equally, the lack of different
sampling methods (i.e. diurnal transect surveys v.s. nocturnal
camera-trapping) have produced an imperfect understanding of tepui
summit biota. Normative fauna can now include all rodents and
opossums mentioned by Tate, as well as coatis and tamanduas.
Anomalous fauna includes unidentified animals/new species, deer,
anteaters, tapirs and carnivores (Panthera leo),
with crab eating foxes not yet observed on the highest elevations of
plateaus, and not yet outside of Auyan. My
recommendations to continue this synthesis are continued literature
reviews to determine proper notation and referencing of tepui fauna
(as with Bradypus tridactylus),
and the implementation of a future camera trapping regime on the
slopes and summits of the eastern sector tepuis.
Biblography
Chapman,
F. M. 1939. Upper zonal birds of Mt. Auyan-Tepui. American
Museum Noviates. 1051:1-15
Havelková
P.,
Robovský J., Audy M., De Pascual, A.D. 2006. Brown-nosed coati
(Nasua
nasua vittata)
on the Roraima tepui (Carnivora: Procyonidae). Lynx (Praha) 37:
123–130
Huber,
O. 1988. Guyana Highlands versus Guyana Lowlands, a reappraisal.
Taxon.
37: 595-614.
Kok, Phillippe J.R,
MacCulloch, Ross D. Means, Bruce D. Roelants, Kim., Bocxlaer, Ines
Van., Bossuyt, Franky. 2012. “Low genetic diversity in tepui summit
vertebrates”. Current Biology Vol 22 #15
Musser,
G. G. and Patton, J. L. 1989 “Systematic studies of Oryzomyine
Rodents (Muridae): the Identity of Oeconys phelpsi Tate”.
American Museum Noviates, # 2961, pp 6
Percequillo,
A. & Weksler, M. 2008. Hylaeamys
laticeps.
In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2.
<www.iucnredlist.org>.
Downloaded on 29
November 2012.
Patton,
J. L., da Silva, M. A. and Malcolm, J. R. 2000. “Mammals of the Rio
Jurua and the Evolutionary and Ecological Diversification of
Amazonia.” Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History
244: 1-306.
Robovsky,
J., Audy, M., Schlogl, J., Diaz Pascual, A., Havelkova, O. 2007.
Additional report of the Brown-nosed Coati (Nasua nasua vittata) on
the tepuis – the Chimanta Massif, Churi Tepui, Venezuela. Lynx
(Praha) 38: 115-117
Rull,
V. 2010. Ecology and Paleoecology: Two Approaches, one Objective.
Open Ecology Journal 3:1-5
Salerno,
P. E., Ron, S. R., Señaris, J. C., Rojas-Runjaic, F. J. M., Noonan,
B. P. and Cannatella, D. C. 2012. Ancient tepui summits harbor young
rather than old lineages of endemic frogs. Evolution
66:3,000-3,013
Tate, G. H. H. 1938.
Auyantepui, Notes on the Phelps Expedition. Geographical Review
28:452-474
Tate, G.H. H. 1939.
Mammals of the Guiana Region. Bulletin of the American Museum of
Natural History 76:15 1-229
- Teresa Vegas-Vilarrúbia, Sandra Nogué, Valentí Rull Global warming, habitat shifts and potential refugia for biodiversity conservation in the neotropical Guayana Highlands Biological Conservation, Volume 152, August 2012, Pages 159–168
Weksler, M., Percequillo, A. R. and Voss, R. S. 2006. “Ten new genera of Oryzomyine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae)”. American Museum Novitates 3537: 1-29.
Comments
Post a Comment