Introduction
For the past several years, I have
undertaken a series of investigations and inquiries into the
biodiversity of the unique tepui ecosystems in the Guianan Highlands
of Northern South America. This investigation has led me to produce
two published articles on the subject of tepui summit fauna and
conservation. The success of these two academic papers (a third is
on the way) has encouraged me to increase and expand my efforts in
this area, identify research gaps, areas of possible danger to the
long term survival of tepui summit biota, and seek to identify work
and strategies which can be undertaken to mitigate future problems in
the unique Pantepui ecosystem.
In 2012 I initiated a camera trapping pilot study with the assistance of Alberto Pomares, Vittorio
Assandria, Paul Stanley, and three expert Pemon guides Arturo Berti,
Santos, and Nixson. The success of the pilot study in obtaining
photographs of tepui summit animals led to the need increase the
parameters of the camera trapping efforts on the tepui summits. After
some discussion with the expedition members from the 2012 expedition
regarding the future of camera trapping and survey efforts in and
around Auyan Tepui, I graciously accepted their invitation to accompany the team on the 2014 Laime
Trail 4 expedition to the Churum Falls, on the summit of Auyan Tepui.
The purpose of the expedition was to follow the
Laime Trail from the southern access point on Auyan up to the Salto
Churum, the waterfall of the Rio Churum which has never been photographed from
the summit. This trail was established by Laime in the 1940s and 1950s, and
roughly proceeds along the survey points established by G. H. H. Tate in the
late 1930s with the Phelps expedition. However, the trail differs from Tates
expedition route in one important way- the Laime trail goes further into the interior
of Auyan Tepui, into places that have not been actively scientifically
surveyed. The portion of the trail we trail up to Campo Dragon is fairly well
surveyed, compared to the more northern portions of Auyan, and represents areas
of tourist activity (approximately 500 tourists per year), with
well-established camps up to the second wall. The areas past the second wall
and into the tepui meadows up to the Salto Churum is not visited by tourists.
Amazingly, our team is the first in the history of tepui exploration to
photograph the Salto Churum from the summit of Auyan Tepui. All previous
photographs of this waterfall have been taken from the air overflying the
Churum River and its waterfall. While traveling across this area, the team also
surveyed the area that Laime had traveled, and looked for traces of his more
permanent camps on the summit. While on this trek, we also tested out three new
camera traps produced by Moultrie,
the D 444 and the A-5 camera trap. These cameras were used along with the
Moultrie D55 IR Gamespay cameras used during the 2012 pilot study to actively
camera trap the summit of Auyan when time and weather permitted.
The expedition had two major
components; the overflight and aerial surveillance of the trail, and the actual
trek itself. Once these two components were successfully completed, it was
decided to follow up with a long term camera trapping survey of Auyan Tepui,
entitled Tepui Watch 2014.
I present here the video
introduction to this work, a fantastic synopsis of both the adventure, science,
and discovery which came from this expedition, authored by Alberto Pomares,
expert photographer and esteemed expedition member.
Long
term Camera Trap surveillance of Auyan Tepui: Tepui Watch 2014
Project Brief
The
objective of this project is to combine long term camera trapping
surveillance of the Laime Trail with transect surveys of the southern
access point of Auyan Tepui to develop a baseline biodiversity
measurement of the tepui. The project utilizes a small network of
trail cameras in four different ecosystems to photograph both endemic
tepui summit fauna and obtain evidence of lowland vertebrates on the
tepui summits, which have been observed and documented by Venezuelan
scientists but not formally published in academia. The project
combines field research with technology and methodology transfers to
indigenous guides who will be trained in the use of trail cameras to
monitor the tepui environment. Data gathered from the transect survey
and camera traps will be made available on at www.biokryptos.org.
Relevant discoveries will be submitted for publication in a peer
reviewed academic journal. If successful, the model developed can be
utilized across the entire Pantepui region, focusing on little
explored tepuis, and close research and exploration gaps after gap
analysis is conducted.
The
project has three phases.
1)
Overflight and aerial surveillance and reconnaissance of the route in
December 2013
2)
An expedition and field implementation of the traps in January 2014
3)
Retrieval and servicing in late and 2015, with additional expeditions
into to unsurveyed areas of Auyan.
There
is one goal in this project; determine the sum total biodiversity of
the Pantepui. Only when the sum total biodiversity is established can
successful long term conservation strategies be devised to ensure the
survival of Pantepui summit biota.
Survey
Area: Auyan Tepui
Auyan
tepui is the largest of the Tepui (flat topped mountain plateau) in
terms of continuous summit area (700 square kilometres) with a slope
area of 200 square kilometres. Officially
discovered in the mid-1930s and first explored in 1937, the summit
hosts the greatest diversity of ecosystems and animal life when
compared to the other tepui summits. The herpetofauna
of Auyan is diverse compared to its sister tepuis, with 27 species of
lizards and snakes represented on the summit of Auyan, many endemic
to either Pantepui or Auyan proper. The mammalian diversity has never
been fully assessed, though it is considered depauperate compared to
lowland mammalian diversity due to a restriction in available niches
on tepui summits in general. Avifaunal diversity is extremely high,
mostly represented by song birds, many with Andean affinities. Auyan
Tepui is host to four types of vegetational assemblages; pioneer
assemblages, tepui summit meadows and woody scrub, evergreen forests
(mostly along river systems and areas with large soil deposits) and
mountain forests on the talus slopes.
A
vegetational map of Auyan Tepui. A/Vs-4) Ombrophilous mesothermic
shrubland over rocky terrain, A 4) Ombrophilous mesothermic shrubland
B-4) Ombrophilous mesothermic forest Vs/A-4) Vegetation covering
rocky terrain and Ombrophilous mesothermic shrubland, Vs-4)
Ombrophilous vegetation covering rocky terrain
They
survey area is the southern entrance point on Auyan Tepui, from
Guayaraca to the Churun Falls. This is an identical rout to the 2012
expedition to Auyan Tepui, during which camera trapping conducted
over a limited period of time resulted in positive captures of the
crab-eating fox Cerdocyon thous thous (Barkoczy 2013).While the Laime trail extends beyond the Churum into the interior of Auyan, the 2014 expedition stopped at the Salto Churum due to time and resource restrictions. Our trek took us through four major vegetational assemblages, however we did not encounter A-4 type Ombrophilous mesothermic shrubland, and very little B-4 ombrophilous mesothermic forest.
Overflight
The
overflight of Auyan Tepui was conducted in December 2014 by Vittorio
Assandria and Alberto Pomares. The goal of the overflight was to
rapidly scout out trails and topographical routes along the Laime
trail into Churum falls. An addendum to the overflight was to overfly
the centre of Auyan Tepui and the western portion of the tepui known
as the Valle Encantata, or the Enchanted Valley. Information gained
from this flight includes photographic records to analyze
vegetational cover and classify the extent of the galley forests,
tepui meadows, and river systems on the summit of Auyan. With the
inclusion of GPS coordinates, trails and areas of interest can be
georeferenced to produce a basic vegetational map of the summit of
Auyan at a resolution which is currently not feasible with satellite
imagery. Areas of interest include the central portion of Auyan
which rises as a dome like structure, and appears to be fire damaged.
The central portions of Auyan Tepui have not been mapped in detail,
reconnaissance and georeferencing of the lagoon and river systems is
a top priority for future exploration and camera trap placement. This
survey was conducted successfully and the flight was filmed, with video of both the Laime trail up to the Rio Churum and the Valle Encantada. One area
of interest was the existence of a river which seems to disappear
into solid rock. This area was selected as a place of interest, and
was made into a base camp for exploring a look-out for the Salto
Churum.
|
Camera
trapping methodology
The
camera trapping methodology will follow the norms and guidelines of
camera trapping studies outlined in established academic circles,
with minor alterations based on field and time constraints. The 2012
camera trapping study utilized two Moultrie D55 IR Gamespy Cameras.
This study uses the two Moultrie D55 IR Gamespy Cameras used in the
initial study, and newer model camera manufactured by Moultrie; two D
444 8 MP Low Glow camera trap, which is compatible with field placed
solar panels, and one Moultrie 5A Low Glow Game Camera. As this is
the first time this particular brand is subjected to the rigors of
functioning for long periods of time on the rain soaked tepui
summits, three different models with different power requirements and
shutter speeds were selected so a post field study analysis can be
conducted on the performance of the cameras. This study will utilize
more trail cameras, placed across a broad spectrum of tepui
ecosystems. The traps will be placed in the following three areas on
Auyan: 1) forested talus slopes, 2) accessible human used trails and
3) remote locations on the tepui summit which reflect ecosystem
diversity.
1)
Talus slope monitoring, Campo Guayaraca, 1000 metre elevation, Penon
1500 metre elevation.(Completed and currently being conducted)
Talus
slope monitoring will create a distribution map of the lowland
animals which can range into higher elevation mountain forests with
tepui-like floral assemblages. As global warming pushes the climate
envelope some 500-700 metres toward the summits, animals photographed
on the slopes may become future invasives within the ascending
climate envelope. Any seed dispersers (such as Cerdocyon thous
or Nasua nasua) photographed on the talus slopes may
contribute to the movement of lowland plant species upwards to the
summit. Understanding where these animals are spatially and
extrapolating their requirements and behaviors can help to produce
effective conservation strategies. Due to the success of the
previous pilot study at this elevation in mid elevation forests, the
camera are placed at 1000 metres and 1500 metres, so that the
complete range of the talus slope forests can be monitored. A blog post detailing both the camera trapping work at Guayaraca and Penon will be ready soon once data is organized and results are compared to previous expeditionary work and mammal surveys of Auyans talus slopes.
2)
Trail Monitoring (Currently being conducted)
Monitoring
faunal distribution along human trails and rest sites can be useful
in determining if human activity is having an impact on the behavior
of tepui mammals. This phenomenon is discussed in both Havelkova et
al (2006) and Robovsky et al (2007) in regard to the presence of
coatis on the tepui summits. Although both authors eventually dismiss
the notion of human enticement in tepui coati distribution, the
phenomena has been photographically documented in two separate
species (Nasua nasua and Cerdocyon thous). The target
areas in this instance are within 100 metres of known rest sites,
including Campo Naranja, Penon, and El Oso. Suitable areas should be
adjacent to these camps, but not intrusive on the trail or itself. A paper exploring the distribution of coatis on the summit of Auyan is currently being finalized.
3)
Summit forests, Remote location Monitoring (Pending)
The
vast majority of Auyan has never been completely surveyed by scientists due to a
variety of factors including expense and the harsh tepui summit
environment. Some of these regions have been visited for short
periods of time by expedition teams in the form of temporary camps,
raging in operation from 1 to 5 days. During these periods, sightings
of large lowland animals have occurred which have never been
investigated in detail. Verification of these reports would change
our understanding of tepui summit biology, as large mammals are
considered absent from the tepui summits. Target areas include the
northern portion of Auyan, the Valle Encantada in the west, and
gallery forests on the central portion of Auyan. Getting to these
locations will require establishing new trails north from Salto Churum, as
well sending field data for review and correlation of camera
trap sites with satellite and overflight data. As this is new
territory, GIS analysis will be need to be conducted to optimize
efforts on the remote and unexplored portions of Auyan.
Arturo Berti, the master camera trapper, Tepui guide, and all around renaissance man of Kamarata. |
Notes on Travel in Venezuela: How to do it right.
While host to amazing biodiversity and beautiful national parks, Venezuela is not an easy country to travel in for those accustomed to problem free, resource available travel. This is not a trip to Europe for the luxury minded tourist. Venezuela is an industrializing nation, host to the problems faced by industrializing nations across the globe- poverty, crime, a lack of resources, and intermittent infrastructure. If any reader is interested in going to Canaima National Park or the Atlantic coast of Venezuela, it can be done with the proper preparation and contacts. I highly recommend that interested parties contact me, or better, get in contact with Paul Stanley at Angel Eco-tours. This expedition would not have been possible with out the assistance and support of Paul Stanley, in terms of in field support, logistics,and friendship. For anyone interested in an adventure trip to Venezuela, Angel Ecotours is a must- the company has more than 20 years experience guiding both tourists and scientists safely through this country. Angel Eco-tours works hand in hand with Angel Conservation, a NGO which is improving the lives of the Pemon of the Kamarata valley through infrastructure improvements and getting medical care to the Pemon. The benefit of working with either Angel Eco-tours or Angel Conservation is that as well as an authentic eco-tour experience with experts, the adventure minded tourist is supporting the sustainable development of the area being visited. Its a unique positive sum situation.
Travel
Log
On January 7th, we arrived at Uruyen
from Ciudad Bolivar. There, we organized our supplies and prepped for the expedition.
We utilized approximately 14 porters for our gear, or 1.5 porters per person.
To minimize the stress and weight carried by the porters, we set a max weight
limit of 30 kilograms. Before the trip, Mary and I agreed to lower our weight
limit to 30 kilograms between the two of us, or 7.5 kilos per person. We also
halved the amount of dry food by accident upon departure from the U.S. Both
these steps were absolutely necessary. While 7.5 kilos per person seems light,
over a long period of time hiking over rocky terrain for several kilometers a
day became extremely arduous, and giving the equipment to the porters proved
very necessary. We discovered that the amount of food we brought, when combined
with what we cooked per meal, was completely sufficient for us.
January 8th-
Set out from Uruyen for Guayaraca late morning (around 10 am). The terrain is
extremely steep, though easily navigated. We reached the camp at Guayaraca
toward the evening, approximately 5pm, with enough time to set up camp and cook
dinner, as well as take some late evening photographs. The hike from the valley
floor to Guayaraca took us through a savana environment into the forests of the
tepui talus slopes, defined by a mixture of tall trees, gallery forests with
mixed vegetation. Animal were difficult to see, with the exception of birds,
and a few small amphibians and reptiles. Mosquitoes were not encountered in
serious numbers. The camp at Guayaraca was a sandy embankment near a small
river, enclosed by forests.
Daniel and Mary halfway to Guayaraca |
|
Camera Trap notes at
Guayaraca
As the Guayaraca camp was the location of the
2012 capture of the crab eating fox Cerdocyon thous thous, we were
excited to set up traps at this location. Two D55 IR Gamespy Cameras were set
up, as well as the two new 444 cameras, in the same location where the fox was
previously photographed. The traps were baited with left over food scraps from
dinner, comprising sauced rice and pastas. The set up was filmed, and the traps
were deployed. The next day, the traps were removed and the SD cards and area
scrutinized. The results were completely negative, and no bait was consumed.
Upon follow up discussion, a variable was discovered. In the successful 2012
camera set up, raw onions were used as bait. The 2012 crew was surprised to
find that raw onions worked to entice a fox, and surprised that cooked highly
odoriferous food failed. We concluded that the bait had the opposite effect as
anticipated- instead of attracting local wildlife, the bait repelled them.
Given the dietary preferences of local wildlife for vegetation, insects, and
small vertebrates, this conclusion was not entirely surprising. It is possible
that the human impact on Auyan, with only 500 or so visitors per year, is so
minimal that local animals have not become accustomed to human food, and will
not perceive it as edible.
Jan
9, Campo Penon
An
all day hike from Guayaraca up to the next talus slope camp, an
area known as Penon. Penon camp is located under a large overhanging
rock, and has been used as a camp since the initial exploration of
Auyan. Vegetation at this point starts to noticeably change, though
lowland assemblages are still prevalent. A series of streams and
waterfalls can be found near the camp, even in the dry season. Small
trees growing amid large boulder define this area, and in places
talus slope and mountain forests dominate up to the escarpments which
define the entrance to the summit of Auyan known as La Ventana. Penon is covered in graffiti placed by tourists going to the summit- most of it is fairly
recent, with attempts made to create fake graffiti indicating that
Jimmi Angel was present at this camp. The bulk of the graffiti seems
to come from the mid 1990s.
The
fauna at Penon was discussed by myself and Arturo, and it seems that
the most common species found at this location are coatis, opossums,
and rodents, though none we sighted. There are numerous monkey
trails, and according to Arturo capuchin monkey are present in
large numbers in this area, and also reside on the escarpments of
Auyan. The food source for these animals includes wild pineapples,
which we saw on the hike from Guayaraca to Penon. This is interesting
to note, as capuchin monkeys were apparently not observed by Tate
during the initial explorations.Tate noted instead that tufted capucjin monkeys Cebus apella were abundant near the Rio Caroni.
Campo Penon, with sleeping niches cut out under the rock overhang. A group photo seems appropriate |
|
Camera
Trap Notation
Camera traps were not deployed at Penon due to a
combination of factors, including limited time at the camp, leading
to our inability to sufficiently explore the surrounding area. While
there are undoubtedly trails and areas in which to photograph an
inventory wildlife, Penon is an extremely steep area, composed of deep
gorges, from which numerous waterfalls and rivers flow. There is now a camera
trapping exerciser underway to survey this area for a month, with a
specific target for obtaining photographic evidence of capuchin
monkeys.
Libertador Jan 10
Libertador
is the first summit camp, located approximately 50 or so metres from
the cave at La Ventana, the entrance point to Auyan. The hike from
Penon to Libertador is rather difficult, and requires the use of
fixed ropes to transverse the large rocks which liter the trail.
Frequent scrambling is requires, and the trek is difficult. This area
is composed entirely of rocky terrain, with trees growing from deep
chasms between the rocks. Vegetation here is extremely complex, and
the area is a transition zone. To gain entrance to the summit, one
must first enter a cave and cross a rock bridge made of fallen
boulders, then exit the cave and enter the summit.
First and foremost, the site is breathtakingly beautiful, with a view of the underlying valley, rock spires, and clouds beneath. In terms of flora, Libertador is extremely interesting. The vegetation is deuded, with a few exceptions. First, complex assemblages a few metres across dot the terrain, and are formed where plants have obtained root in substrate which lies in shallow pools. These isolated islands of vegetation have diverse populations of mosses and lichens, and well as a myrian of carnivorous plans and woody bonnetia trees. The Libertador camp itself is located on top of a 30 to 30 metre diameter pean deposit which is extremely deep, and underlies a complet series of bogs, again with a complex and diverse floral assemblage. This area would be fantastic for future peat dating, as the peat moss is possibly a metre deep in some places, and very old.
First and foremost, the site is breathtakingly beautiful, with a view of the underlying valley, rock spires, and clouds beneath. In terms of flora, Libertador is extremely interesting. The vegetation is deuded, with a few exceptions. First, complex assemblages a few metres across dot the terrain, and are formed where plants have obtained root in substrate which lies in shallow pools. These isolated islands of vegetation have diverse populations of mosses and lichens, and well as a myrian of carnivorous plans and woody bonnetia trees. The Libertador camp itself is located on top of a 30 to 30 metre diameter pean deposit which is extremely deep, and underlies a complet series of bogs, again with a complex and diverse floral assemblage. This area would be fantastic for future peat dating, as the peat moss is possibly a metre deep in some places, and very old.
Alberto, Mary and I make summit |
Camera
Trapping notes
The Faunal elements of this area are largely not present at the summit rim, although in the pools which underlie the vegetational isolates, a tremendous amount of tadpoles of an undetermined frog species were present. Camera traps were not deployed at this location due time constraints.
The Faunal elements of this area are largely not present at the summit rim, although in the pools which underlie the vegetational isolates, a tremendous amount of tadpoles of an undetermined frog species were present. Camera traps were not deployed at this location due time constraints.
One of our youngest porters enjoying the view. This was his first trek to the summit. |
|
Libertador
to El Oso, intermediate camp. Jan 11- 12
The
hike from Libertador to El Oso comprised approximately six hours of
hiking through rough terrain in the first two hours, followed by a
trek through a eroded rockscape punctuated by small isolated
vegetational islands, then into a dry river bed which was again
highly eroded, with little substrate. Vegetation in this area changed
from the moon scape typical of Roraima tepui into areas with more
substrate, which developed into bogs and marshland dominated by woody
bonnetia trees, carnivorous plants, and stegolepis. As we approached
the El Oso rock formation and Naranja camp, we stopped to investigate
the rock, and found anchor bolts had been placed there for lead
climbing.
After Campo Naranja was reached, we proceeded to an intermediate camp between
Naranja and Dragon, following the path of a long meandering river
which leads from Dragon. This area was composed of riparian gallery
forests which made up the majority of the valley. The river was
devoid of any sign s of fish which allegedly are present further into the northern portion of the plateau, north of the Churum River.
The
river itself was strewn with boulders, though dry season conditions
made the water extremely still. Various species of water beetles were
present, though we observed no other aquatic life in this area.
Camera
trap notes
This
place seemed like a good area to camera trap, and we had sufficient
time to place and bait the traps. In this area we placed the traps
along forested sections of the river to entice animals wandering or
foraging parallel to the river. We used two types of bait- raw
vegetables, and odoriferous left over cooked food, to test our hypothesis that tepui summit fauna will avoid cooked camp food. The results next morning showed that the left over food was untouched, though the raw
vegetables were strewn about, indicting something had visited the
site. No photos were taken, and the traps failed to fire. We
determined at this point that cooked leftovers were a failure for a
bait source, and decided to abandon their use in later camera trap
set up. This site is of future interest, as the riparian ecosystem
seems conducive for animal use.
Along the hike, we looked for traces of Laimes activity on the summit of Auyan Tepui. Allegedly, at this location, Laime established a food drop at the El Oso rock formation, though this is debatable. It may be that Laimes summit camp was in fact in a different location. We did encounter an aged metal box on the way to the intermediate camp, which according to the Pemon expedition leader Santos belonged to Laime, and was used by him to store supplies on Auyan.
Dragon Jan 13-15
The
hike to Campo Dragon took the team a few hours over easy terrain through
forests teeming with life, insects, and a tremendous diversity of
epiphytes. Arriving at Dragon at mid day, we had plenty of time to
explore the surrounding territory. The vegetation at dragon was
dense, with high canopy gallery forests, and shrubby plants near the
banks of the river. There is a clear differentiation between the
forests and the banks of the river, evidence that we were in
a dry season lull on Auyan. The steep sandy banks demonstrated that the
river is much higher during the wet season. Campo Dragon was the site
of a good deal of animal activity. Upon entering the camp, we
immediately saw a tepui tinamou (Crypturellus ptaritepui), colloquially know as a gallia de la
montana, a Guiana Shield endemic, and member of the only known flying ratites birds. Animals could be heard both at night, and during
the day, but remained visually elusive. The banks of the river at Dragon is composed of extremely fine grained pink quartzite sand. A large number of enormous quartzite boulders litter the
landscape here, though they are all grey black in coloration. This
grey-black color is caused by cyano bacteria which has colonized the
surface of the rock, making it appear dark and producing an accelerated process of bioerosion.
The
river at Dragon is strewn with boulders, which the river itself dips
under. These outcroppings overlay a deep and extensive aquatic cave system,
which this river flows through. It is truly a unique river system,
and potentially hazardous to cross when flooded during the wet
season, due to the deep grooves, unpredictable eddies, and uneven
surface. However, during the dry season, the top of the rocks stay
dry and the surface is level enough in areas that helicopters
frequently land here to take travelers off the summit.
Aquatic
life here is abundant compared to the down stream camps. We observed
several species of aquatic insects at this location, including the
hellgramite of a large dobsonfly (subfamily Corydalinae). There are no fish in this section
of the river. Though fish have been reported from Auyan Tepui in the
lagoons further north, it is possible that the rocky river bottoms,
boulders, and cave systems make it impossible for anything other than
insects to live in this river system. Alternatively, this could be dry
season sampling bias.
A tremendous diversity of aquatic insects were present on the summit of Auyan, in virtually every rocky pool, stream, and lagoon. Above are three photos taken. On the left, the hellgramite of a dobsonfly. Centre is a nymph, and on the right and aquatic beetle.
A tremendous diversity of aquatic insects were present on the summit of Auyan, in virtually every rocky pool, stream, and lagoon. Above are three photos taken. On the left, the hellgramite of a dobsonfly. Centre is a nymph, and on the right and aquatic beetle.
As it was the dry season, the river was easily navigated by foot
at this point, and we proceeded up stream. Approximately 50 metres or
so from camp, we encountered a sand bar which was littered with
footprints. We could easily distinguish three distinct mammal
footprints, one apparently from an opossum, one from an yet
unidentified species of carnivora, and one from a species of deer. We
also encountered numerous bird foot prints, and the trail of a large snake. We
estimate that the foot prints were made very recently in the preceding few days,
as a previous rain would have erased the tracks had they been older
than a week.
Upon
our departure from Campo Dragon, we observed a small opossum rummaging
around in the camp, which while skittish and nervous, showed little
fear of humans. The species was Didelphis imperfecta, a species of opossum which
is endemic to the Guiana Shield.
Camera
trapping notes and foot print notes
Campo Dragon is an excellent place to both place camera traps, and to
explore the biodiversity of tepui forests and bogs. To the east of
Dragon lie tepui meadows, to the west lie forests. The area
represents an perennial source of water, and by rough calculation 80%
of Auyan's local mammal community should be located within 6
or so kilometres of it, though in reality a series of small streams exist throughout the tepui summit.
We
set up five camera traps in Campo Dragon, approximately 10 to 20
metres from camp. We decided to use raw carrot peels for bait. At Dragon, we got positive camera trap results,
obtaining photos of the opossum Didelphis imperfect, probably the
same individual that visited the camp later that morning.
|
These four sets of prints were found on a sand bank at Campo Dragon. Updates on the exact species the tracks belong to will be presented in a subsequent post. In a broad sense, the top are from a mammalian carnivore, the third from a deer, and the last from a small animal, possibly a possum.
|
Salto Churum Camp
We
left Dragon and went up past an area known as the Second Wall, a 300
meter change in elevation which took us through a rocky terrain
interspersed with the last of the gallery forests we were to
encounter on this trip. Once we made it out of the second wall, we
entered a vast expanse of tepui bog marsh, in which the vegetation
was made up almost exclusively of Stegolepis, Heliamphora,
Bonnetia,and other small woody plants and complex vegetation. Walking in
this terrain is arduous. The entire area is flooded, with peat bogs comprising a thick carpet upon which substrate accrues and plants grow. Solid surfaces were
almost impossible to find, and everyone was relieved when we
encountered slabs or rocks which supplied sure footing. After hours
trekking through this botanically fascinating yet torturous terrain,
we made camp near a river which disappears into a rock face. This area was chosen for two reasons; to investigate the river which from
the air seems to disappear to nowhere, and because it seemed to be a
convenient location in which to place a base camp which is right
next to the Salto Churum with a source of fresh water. The idea was
to get to the Salto Churum, photograph it, and then move up and
explore the Rio Churum.
And
then the weather turned unpleasant. An impenetrable fog, together
with a consistent light rain made hiking impossible. The fog limited
visibility to a few metres, which was not sufficient to find a trail
to look at or view the waterfall. In our down time, we looked around
the camp, photographed the local plants, and rested. On the
third day, we finally got a break in the weather, and were able to
cut a trail to the Salto. Although from the overflight the ground
looked level, Arturo found that the path was bordered by a 6 metre
drop in a number of locations, and we had to scout our way around
this drops to a level area.
We
managed to find a path to a look out, and waited for the fog and low
lying clouds to clear. After 45 minutes our patience paid off, and we
could view the Salto Churum in all its glory, from the summit. This
was a rather historical moment, as we were the first expedition team
to photograph the falls from the summit of Auyan, instead of from the
air. There have been other people to photograph the falls, and I
highly recommend that a view of this page to see the difficulties and
technology necessary to produce 3D images of this amazing area. Our
mission was accomplished at this point- we left the Auyan Tepui with
a deep sense of satisfaction; we had hiked the Laime Trail, seen
evidence of large mammals on its summit, used our camera traps to
photograph its wildlife, and been the first to photograph the Salto
Churum from the summit.
Salto Churum, through fog, photographed by Alberto Pomares |
Arturo, two guides, and Vittorio in the Churum river, mere feet from the edge of the Salto Churum |
Expedition Exit
At
this point, we contacted our helicopter for an exit. Like everything
else in Venezuela, and when traveling in general, the helicopter was
quite late to our pick up near the river at the final camp, due to logistics and weather. This worked out in our favor, however.
Under
normal circumstances, we would take a quick 6 minute ride back to the southern entrance point, and be back to Uruyen. However, the weather
that direction turned nasty, so we had to head north. We loaded up,
and took an amazing tour of the summit of Auyan Tepui toward Angel
Falls, crossing more meadows, lagoons, dense forest, deep canyons,
and unexplored terrain. We flew past Angel Falls, the highest waterfall in the
world, and had a beautiful clear view of the falls. It took us nearly
45 minutes to then head south, and we had a fantastic view of the
slopes of Auyan and the rest of Canaima. We saw places no one
explored before, places untrodden by human feet. Gigantic trees
litter the slopes of Auyan on the eastern side of the talus slopes,
and hundreds of small waterfalls proceed from its myriad of
escarpments. It is amazing to see this area- places so close to us,
yet unexplored and untouched by man simply due to the difficulty in
getting to these locations, and the lack of public interest in
funding large scale expeditions. The eastern talus slopes and summit
of Auyan remain unexplored. The scope of the task to preserve this
location is almost unimaginable. With the realities of global warming
becoming more apparent everyday, it is vital that we work to save the
biodiversity of these places, and yet so much of nature remains
unsurveyed. We risk loosing a critical portion of the biosphere
before we even know what we have lost- effectively loosing our own
Lost World to the inevitable crawl of destruction that human societal
evolution brings to the natural world. Its difficult not to wax
poetic about this sad fact, after seeing it first hand.
Conclusions
The
parameters of the expedition were completed- we accomplished our
mission of hiking to the Salto Churum. What is most critical about this
expedition is that it has not ended- it is being continued in survey
form by two Pemon guides, led by Arturo Berti. Arturo assisted with
the first 2012 camera trapping expedition, in which we discovered the
crab-eating fox at Guayaraca. He then spearheaded the 2014 camera
trapping with us on Auyan, and is now undertaking the first year long
moving camera trap transect survey of Auyan. At this time, he has
completed the first step in this process, the placement of five
camera traps in Guayaraca, and has moved the traps up to the higher
altitude camp an Penon. This project will continue to grow with the
support of people interested in keeping the tepuis alive and healthy,
and contributing to Pemon stewardship of their land.
We learned a few critical things from this expedition, all of which will support our camera trapping campaign on the summit, as well as efforts to preserve and support both the Kamarta Pemon community and the tepuis in general. First, there is a tremendous interest by the Pemon to explore the tepui summits, protect their biodiversity, and regulate tourism to avoid damage to their lands. This must be followed up on, as the Pemon are in the best position, of anyone in the world, to safeguard their inheritance. Only by working with these people, and listening to their detailed knowledge of the region, can an accurate survey of the tepuis be produced. Thus, first and foremost, research gaps and biological knowledge must be cross-referenced with the Pemon to assure accuracy. To do otherwise is to ignore the most knowledgeable people on earth, which is patently idiotic.
Secondly, camera trapping is an effective method of surveying the biodiversity of the tepuis in terms of large animals. The Guayaraca campaign produced tremendous results, which will be discussed in a subsequent blog post, though suffice to say the results average one picture per day. When camera trapping is combined with the knowledge and expertise of Pemon guides, the results are even more impressive. This technique can be adapted to the 50+ tepuis in the Guiana Shield, and the results will probably be extremely enlightening.
Thirdly, we have demonstrated that Auyan Tepui maintains a greater diversity of large animals then previously thought, and that diversity is somewhat cryptic. It is cryptic due to exploration gaps, bias in scientific literature which omits research from Venezuelan scientists and the knowledge of indigenous peoples, and the difficulty of maintaining a long term survey effort on a tepui summit. Luckily, the methods developed by this expedition, and by the work of Tepui Watch 2014, we can eliminate the cause of of these gaps, and fully explore new avenues of scientific investigation and conservation of the tepuis of the Guiana Shield.
We learned a few critical things from this expedition, all of which will support our camera trapping campaign on the summit, as well as efforts to preserve and support both the Kamarta Pemon community and the tepuis in general. First, there is a tremendous interest by the Pemon to explore the tepui summits, protect their biodiversity, and regulate tourism to avoid damage to their lands. This must be followed up on, as the Pemon are in the best position, of anyone in the world, to safeguard their inheritance. Only by working with these people, and listening to their detailed knowledge of the region, can an accurate survey of the tepuis be produced. Thus, first and foremost, research gaps and biological knowledge must be cross-referenced with the Pemon to assure accuracy. To do otherwise is to ignore the most knowledgeable people on earth, which is patently idiotic.
Secondly, camera trapping is an effective method of surveying the biodiversity of the tepuis in terms of large animals. The Guayaraca campaign produced tremendous results, which will be discussed in a subsequent blog post, though suffice to say the results average one picture per day. When camera trapping is combined with the knowledge and expertise of Pemon guides, the results are even more impressive. This technique can be adapted to the 50+ tepuis in the Guiana Shield, and the results will probably be extremely enlightening.
Thirdly, we have demonstrated that Auyan Tepui maintains a greater diversity of large animals then previously thought, and that diversity is somewhat cryptic. It is cryptic due to exploration gaps, bias in scientific literature which omits research from Venezuelan scientists and the knowledge of indigenous peoples, and the difficulty of maintaining a long term survey effort on a tepui summit. Luckily, the methods developed by this expedition, and by the work of Tepui Watch 2014, we can eliminate the cause of of these gaps, and fully explore new avenues of scientific investigation and conservation of the tepuis of the Guiana Shield.
Comments
Post a Comment